Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pensacola Journal"

From Pensapedia, the Pensacola encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(1905)
m (1905)
Line 81: Line 81:
 
*[[June 7]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109188 link]
 
*[[June 7]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109188 link]
 
*[[June 8]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109189 link]
 
*[[June 8]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109189 link]
*June 9 issue missing
 
 
*[[June 10]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109190 link]
 
*[[June 10]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109190 link]
 
*[[June 11]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109191 link]
 
*[[June 11]] [http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/UFDC/?i=109191 link]

Revision as of 21:32, 9 March 2009

Digital copies

The following issues of the Pensacola Journal are available online:

1905

1905
January February March April May June
  • No January issues
  • No February issues
  • No March issues
July August September October November December
  • No November issues
  • No December issues

1906

1906
January February March April May June
July August September October November December

1908

1908
January February March April May June
  • No January issues
  • No February issues
  • No March issues
  • No April issues
  • No May issues
  • No June issues
July August September October November December
  • No October issues
  • No November issues
  • No December issues

1909

1909
January February March April May June
  • No January issues
  • No February issues
  • No March issues
July August September October November December
  • No July issues
  • No August issues
  • No September issues
Special section — link
Wow, this is fantastic! — admin • talk  18:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm excited about it. Less schlepping up to UWF, maybe. — dscossontalk  19:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Should we move this table (and future ones) to the article page? — dscossontalk  17:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Whichever you prefer. Maybe each year's table could go in the year article or its talk page (e.g. Talk:1905), with cross-links from the Journal article (e.g. "For digital archives of selected issues, see...")? Again, this is fantastic! — admin • talk  01:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't know, I can't decide what to do with them. — dscossontalk  13:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)