9,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Joe, good job condensing my verbose lead. About the Godzilla admission/off the record status... I would say that if the anonymous contributor still takes issue with that section, and we can figure out some way to source/cite it, we could clarify that section with something like "Bergosh maintains that the admission was "off the record"." or something like that. I don't know. Trying to be as neutral as possible. Sigh. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 19:03, 25 November 2007 (CST)
==Why change Godzilla?==
I don't understand why "Godzilla controversy" is not an acceptable section header. The same editor has repeatedly tried to remove '''Godzilla''' from the intro paragraphs as well. It's a much more concise and accurate descriptor, since the controversy wasn't just about the fact that Bergosh used a pseudonym, but rather extended into the subsequent actions by both Bergosh and the ''News Journal''. To the anonymous contributor (who should consider [[Special:Userlogin|creating a username]]), please detail your reasoning on this talk page or I will revert to the previous section header. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 09:39, 28 November 2007 (CST)
