Editing Pitt's Slip
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Later that year the city opened the project to other bids, sparking a complaint by Yates, who said he had met informally with [[Pensacola City Manager|city manager]] [[Steve Garmen]] and city planners in creating their proposal and had been "assured back then that we were the only people that were even interested."<ref name="dealallegations">"Pitt Slip 'deal' allegations appear thin." ''Pensacola Journal'', March 6, 1982.</ref> Three of the Harbour principals — Baker, Carr and Ritchie — splintered off and submitted their own proposal. A third proposal was also presented by [[Arcadia Realty Group]], represented by [[Don Ripley]]. | Later that year the city opened the project to other bids, sparking a complaint by Yates, who said he had met informally with [[Pensacola City Manager|city manager]] [[Steve Garmen]] and city planners in creating their proposal and had been "assured back then that we were the only people that were even interested."<ref name="dealallegations">"Pitt Slip 'deal' allegations appear thin." ''Pensacola Journal'', March 6, 1982.</ref> Three of the Harbour principals — Baker, Carr and Ritchie — splintered off and submitted their own proposal. A third proposal was also presented by [[Arcadia Realty Group]], represented by [[Don Ripley]]. | ||
− | <gallery caption="Pitt Slip proposals, 1981 | + | <gallery caption="Pitt Slip proposals, 1981"> |
File:PittsSlipConcept-HarbourCorp.jpg|Proposal by Harbour Corporation, estimated at $3.4 million | File:PittsSlipConcept-HarbourCorp.jpg|Proposal by Harbour Corporation, estimated at $3.4 million | ||
File:PittsSlipConcept-BakerCarrRitchie.jpg|Proposal by Baker, Carr & Ritchie, estimated between $1.5-1.8 million | File:PittsSlipConcept-BakerCarrRitchie.jpg|Proposal by Baker, Carr & Ritchie, estimated between $1.5-1.8 million | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
On [[September 27]], [[1983]], Baird and Yates announced they wanted to end their development agreement, saying the city had failed to deliver marketable title "within a reasonable time" as stated in the contract. They also chided the city for announcing a resolution to the title issues after they had already approached officials privately about terminating the lease. "This kind of media ploy is not what we need," Yates said. "For any such project to be successful, there has to be open and honest communication between the groups."<ref>"Developers want out of Pitt Slip." ''Pensacola Journal'', September 28, 1983.</ref> | On [[September 27]], [[1983]], Baird and Yates announced they wanted to end their development agreement, saying the city had failed to deliver marketable title "within a reasonable time" as stated in the contract. They also chided the city for announcing a resolution to the title issues after they had already approached officials privately about terminating the lease. "This kind of media ploy is not what we need," Yates said. "For any such project to be successful, there has to be open and honest communication between the groups."<ref>"Developers want out of Pitt Slip." ''Pensacola Journal'', September 28, 1983.</ref> | ||
− | === | + | ===Multiple marinas=== |
− | + | {{sectstub}} | |
− | + | ==Seville Harbour== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | == | ||
− | |||
{{main|Seville Harbour}} | {{main|Seville Harbour}} | ||
− | + | {{sectstub}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==References== | ==References== |