Difference between revisions of "Pensapedia talk:Notability"

From Pensapedia, the Pensacola encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
  
I presume that pages for local teachers would not be suited for Pensapedia unless they received a notable award? [[User:Sethisodd|Sethisodd]] 20:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
+
I presume that pages for local teachers would not be suited for Pensapedia unless they received a notable award (since that goes under the category of "prominent in their fields"? [[User:Sethisodd|Sethisodd]] 20:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
:Correct. They'd have to be notable for something else. <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif; color:#cccccc;">&mdash;&nbsp;'''''[[User:Admin|admin]]'''''&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;'''''[[User_talk:Admin|talk]]'''''&nbsp;</span> 20:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:37, 7 March 2009

What do you think about Joshua A. Jones? Almost certainly vanity. Notable? dscosson ··· talk 15:28, 13 April 2008 (CDT)

Does seem like a vanity page, but at least it's fairly objective. If he is a professor and does provide pro bono representation to the groups listed, it might be "notable enough." Let me email Susan Watson if she can verify. --Admin 16:15, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
Well, the AWKO website verifies most of it [1]. I really don't care either way. He's the closest thing left that is borderline (that I can find). dscosson ··· talk 16:16, 13 April 2008 (CDT)


I presume that pages for local teachers would not be suited for Pensapedia unless they received a notable award (since that goes under the category of "prominent in their fields"? Sethisodd 20:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Correct. They'd have to be notable for something else. — admin • talk  20:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)