Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| What would you think of grouping elections by decade instead of by year? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 12:38, 4 May 2008 (CDT) | | What would you think of grouping elections by decade instead of by year? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 12:38, 4 May 2008 (CDT) |
− | :Any particular reason? I kind-of like it by year, as it will be really easy to see all election articles for a given year (3-4 articles) once I have done more of them. But then again, I guess it wouldn't be that much harder to sort them out of the 12-15 that would be in a decade-based category. Whatever you want to do, I don't feel strongly about it. '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 13:14, 4 May 2008 (CDT)
| |
− | ::I was just thinking that 10-20 articles is a pretty good "category size," and [[:Category:Elections by decade]] would have a more manageable number of subcategories than [[:Category:Elections by year]]. But you've really been tackling all these elections, so whichever you prefer is fine. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 08:24, 5 May 2008 (CDT)
| |
− | :::I really don't care :-)... if you want to do the work to change it to your preference, go ahead, but I don't care enough to do it myself. '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 11:10, 5 May 2008 (CDT)
| |
Return to "Elections by year" page.