Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Copied from Wikipedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Is this category really necessary? ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this category really necessary? [[User:Pat.osullivan|Pat.osullivan]] 20:44, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | Is this category really necessary? [[User:Pat.osullivan|Pat.osullivan]] 20:44, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | :This category is added automatically to pages that have the template '''<nowiki>{{wikipedia}}</nowiki>''' to denote that the text is mostly from Wikipedia. (Admittedly, many of the articles I started with a Wikipedia base do not include the template, as it was added later.) Ideally, we should try to have all original writing, to reflect a Pensacola-specific focus instead of Wikipedia's more general audience, so having this category gives us a sort of checklist of which articles are left to rewrite. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 01:21, 25 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:21, 25 March 2007
Is this category really necessary? Pat.osullivan 20:44, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
- This category is added automatically to pages that have the template {{wikipedia}} to denote that the text is mostly from Wikipedia. (Admittedly, many of the articles I started with a Wikipedia base do not include the template, as it was added later.) Ideally, we should try to have all original writing, to reflect a Pensacola-specific focus instead of Wikipedia's more general audience, so having this category gives us a sort of checklist of which articles are left to rewrite. --Admin 01:21, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
