Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naval Air Station Pensacola"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Should Forrest Sherman Field be its own article or part of the larger NAS article? ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Ah yes, thanks for doing the rewrite. I wonder if it should be noted at WP's article as well? If anything, they're stricter about such things than we are. BTW, are you able to make the meeting next week? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:27, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | :Ah yes, thanks for doing the rewrite. I wonder if it should be noted at WP's article as well? If anything, they're stricter about such things than we are. BTW, are you able to make the meeting next week? --[[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:27, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Yeah, sorry, my email inbox is swamped. But I certainly can. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 08:05, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | ::Yeah, sorry, my email inbox is swamped. But I certainly can. '''[[User:Dcosson|dcosson]]''' ··· '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' 08:05, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Forrest Sherman Field== | ||
| + | Should Forrest Sherman Field be its own article or part of the larger NAS article? <span style="font-variant:small-caps; vertical-align:5%; font-family: Georgia,serif; color:#cccccc;">— '''[[User:Dscosson|dscosson]]''' • '''[[User talk:Dcosson|talk]]''' </span> 12:17, 22 November 2009 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 22 November 2009
Dunno if you noticed my rewrite in progress - but it was prompted when I noticed a lot of the history section (which we pulled right from WP) is lifted right from the NAS Pensacola site. Very probably not copyrighted but in lousy taste. dcosson ··· talk 00:26, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
- Ah yes, thanks for doing the rewrite. I wonder if it should be noted at WP's article as well? If anything, they're stricter about such things than we are. BTW, are you able to make the meeting next week? --Admin 07:27, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
Forrest Sherman Field
Should Forrest Sherman Field be its own article or part of the larger NAS article? — dscosson • talk 12:17, 22 November 2009 (CST)
