Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jeff Bergosh"

From Pensapedia, the Pensacola encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Conflict of interest)
(Conflict of interest)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
I believe your second revision was better than the original.  I still believe the piece is inaccurate, however, with the latest changes I believe it accurately portrays both sides.  I would caution, particularly on this piece, against using too much of the PNJ's material to create an accurate page, as there has been extreme tension between the subject of this piece and the PNJ editor/editorial staff.
+
I believe your second revision was better than the original.  I still believe the piece is inaccurate, however, with the latest changes I believe it more accurately portrays both sides than the original.  I do not agree with the use of the term "Scandal"--this would give the appearance of something illegal or innappropriate.  look to the unbiased sources to clear that up (  UWD Voyager article and/or NWFl daily news article  ) Additionally, it is very widely known that Bergosh was critical of the PNJ's editorials slamming Educational Quality in Escambia County.  I would suggest that you find and link Richard Schneider's editorial (as well as associated forum posts) from August 12, 2007.  Also Mark O'brien's piece from September 30, 2007, (and associated forum posts).  Both of these editorials and responses were prior to the erruption of the "controversy", and many feel these editorial responses were the impetus for the PNJ's expose on Bergosh.  I would caution, particularly on this piece, against using too much of the PNJ's material to create an accurate page, as there has been extreme tension between the subject of this piece and the PNJ editor/editorial staff.

Revision as of 13:02, 25 November 2007

Conflict of interest

I must assume that the recent contributor to this Jeff Bergosh article is either Mr. Bergosh or a close friend/relation. We appreciate your participation on Pensapedia, but please understand that you have a conflict of interest on this issue. If you feel the article is inaccurate or has misrepresented the facts, please make a note of your concerns on this talk page. Some of your revisions promote a biased viewpoint and contradict statements cited in the News Journal sources. I understand the frustration of making verifiable claims when you have a conflict with the newspaper-of-record, but I'm sure we can come to a compromise. Thanks for your cooperation. --Admin 12:15, 23 November 2007 (CST)


I believe your second revision was better than the original. I still believe the piece is inaccurate, however, with the latest changes I believe it more accurately portrays both sides than the original. I do not agree with the use of the term "Scandal"--this would give the appearance of something illegal or innappropriate. look to the unbiased sources to clear that up ( UWD Voyager article and/or NWFl daily news article ) Additionally, it is very widely known that Bergosh was critical of the PNJ's editorials slamming Educational Quality in Escambia County. I would suggest that you find and link Richard Schneider's editorial (as well as associated forum posts) from August 12, 2007. Also Mark O'brien's piece from September 30, 2007, (and associated forum posts). Both of these editorials and responses were prior to the erruption of the "controversy", and many feel these editorial responses were the impetus for the PNJ's expose on Bergosh. I would caution, particularly on this piece, against using too much of the PNJ's material to create an accurate page, as there has been extreme tension between the subject of this piece and the PNJ editor/editorial staff.