Editing Segregation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
In [[1905]], [[John Campbell Avery, Jr.]], State Representative for Pensacola, introduced a bill providing for the segregation of streetcars. The summary of the bill was as follows: | In [[1905]], [[John Campbell Avery, Jr.]], State Representative for Pensacola, introduced a bill providing for the segregation of streetcars. The summary of the bill was as follows: | ||
<blockquote>An act to require street car companies and others in this state, to furnish separate cars or divisions for white and colored passengers; to require said companies and others to keep white and colored passengers in their respective cars or divisions; to give conductors and employees of said companies police powers; and to provide penalties [$25 fine and/or 30 days' imprisonment] for the violation of this act.<ref>"Mr. Avery's Race Separation Bill." ''Pensacola Journal'', April 25, 1905.</ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>An act to require street car companies and others in this state, to furnish separate cars or divisions for white and colored passengers; to require said companies and others to keep white and colored passengers in their respective cars or divisions; to give conductors and employees of said companies police powers; and to provide penalties [$25 fine and/or 30 days' imprisonment] for the violation of this act.<ref>"Mr. Avery's Race Separation Bill." ''Pensacola Journal'', April 25, 1905.</ref></blockquote> | ||
− | Pensacola's black population responded immediately to the bill (which the legislature would pass | + | Pensacola's black population responded immediately to the bill (which the legislature would pass unanimously) by boycotting the [[streetcar system]]. A report was sent to streetcar parent company Stone & Webster saying, "In Pensacola 90% of the negroes have stopped riding even though the company has not issued an order or intimated anything as to what they intend to do. The negroes have appointed Committees who meet negroes visiting their city at the train and present each one with a button to be worn in the lapel of the coat. This button bears the single word WALK."<ref name="ortiz">Paul Ortiz. ''Emancipation Betrayed: The Hidden History of Black Organizing and White Violence in Florida from Reconstruction to the Bloody Election of 1920''. University of California Press, 2005.</ref> Some African-Americans rode the streetcars despite the boycott, but according to the ''[[Pensacola Journal]]'', "in each case when they are seen by persons of their own race they are subjected to taunts and cries of 'Jim Crow.'"<ref name="ortiz"/> |
The law went into effect on [[July 1]], [[1905]], the full text of which read: | The law went into effect on [[July 1]], [[1905]], the full text of which read: | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<p>Sec. 5. That any passenger willfully occupying any car or division of car other than that to which he has been assigned, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be punished by a fine not to exceed $25.00, or by imprisonment not to exceed thirty days. Conductors and all other employes in charge of such cars or divisions of cars are hereby clothed with the power to eject from the car or cars any passenger who refuses to occupy such car or division to which he may be assigned.</p> | <p>Sec. 5. That any passenger willfully occupying any car or division of car other than that to which he has been assigned, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be punished by a fine not to exceed $25.00, or by imprisonment not to exceed thirty days. Conductors and all other employes in charge of such cars or divisions of cars are hereby clothed with the power to eject from the car or cars any passenger who refuses to occupy such car or division to which he may be assigned.</p> | ||
<p>Sec. 6. If any such employe having charge of any such car shall permit white and colored passengers to occupy the same car or division, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of not exceeding fifty dollars or imprisonment for not exceeding thirty days or both in the discretion of the court.</p> | <p>Sec. 6. If any such employe having charge of any such car shall permit white and colored passengers to occupy the same car or division, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of not exceeding fifty dollars or imprisonment for not exceeding thirty days or both in the discretion of the court.</p> | ||
− | <p>Sec. 7. That the provisions of this act shall not apply to colored | + | <p>Sec. 7. That the provisions of this act shall not apply to colored curses having the care of white children or sick persons.</p> |
<p>Sec. 8. That nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent the running of extra, or special cars for the exclusive accommodation of either white or colored passengers, if the regular cars are operated as usual, as required by this act.</p> | <p>Sec. 8. That nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent the running of extra, or special cars for the exclusive accommodation of either white or colored passengers, if the regular cars are operated as usual, as required by this act.</p> | ||
<p>Sec. 9. That all laws or parts of laws in conflict with this act are hereby repealed.</p> | <p>Sec. 9. That all laws or parts of laws in conflict with this act are hereby repealed.</p> | ||
− | <p>Sec. 10. That this act shall take effect on the 1st day of July, 1905.<ref name="effective">"'Jim Crow' Law Is Now Effective." ''Pensacola Journal'', July 1, 1905.</ref | + | <p>Sec. 10. That this act shall take effect on the 1st day of July, 1905.</p><ref name="effective">"'Jim Crow' Law Is Now Effective." ''Pensacola Journal'', July 1, 1905.</ref> |
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
− | The | + | The Florida Supreme Court (in ''Florida v. Patterson'') struck down the Avery law a month after its passage, after which the ''Pensacola Journal'' noted, "The negroes began to ride early and it was noticeable that they almost invariably occupied the front seats."<ref name="ortiz"/> |
− | |||
− | |||
However, segregation was soon reinstituted when the [[City of Pensacola]] passed an ordinance (sponsored by the [[Pensacola Chamber of Commerce|Chamber of Commerce]]) using modified Avery language. The ordinance was vetoed by [[Pensacola Mayor|Mayor]] [[Charles H. Bliss]], out of concerns that it would also be found unconstitutional, but was passed by the council regardless. It went into effect on [[October 13]], 1905. | However, segregation was soon reinstituted when the [[City of Pensacola]] passed an ordinance (sponsored by the [[Pensacola Chamber of Commerce|Chamber of Commerce]]) using modified Avery language. The ordinance was vetoed by [[Pensacola Mayor|Mayor]] [[Charles H. Bliss]], out of concerns that it would also be found unconstitutional, but was passed by the council regardless. It went into effect on [[October 13]], 1905. | ||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
'''Desegregation''' of facilities occurred gradually over many years. | '''Desegregation''' of facilities occurred gradually over many years. | ||
*Following a seven-month boycott led by the [[Pensacola Council of Ministers]], lunch counters at all Pensacola businesses were integrated in early [[1962]].<ref>''Jet'', March 15, 1962.</ref> | *Following a seven-month boycott led by the [[Pensacola Council of Ministers]], lunch counters at all Pensacola businesses were integrated in early [[1962]].<ref>''Jet'', March 15, 1962.</ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
{{sectstub}} | {{sectstub}} | ||